Griznuq Gaming

Quote from: JohanDray - do you want me to make your character for you?  :)

OMG NO! 8O

Come on Matt?! He's Johan! He creates time.

Forthcoming

Since we do not have the time to play-out such conversations on our bi-monthly sessions, I encourage this sort of tactic. Please use email to have any conversations "in game" with other players, and "cc" me at my yahoo email address. If you don't have access to it, please email me at work and I will send it to you.

I only have the common sense stipulations that any conversation happen in the past, and that it occured during a time the characters would have been physically able to do so.

I look forward to the forthcoming emails.  :)

Had to re-write the response to this thread twice.

Discussions that do no directly effect gameplay can be had from player to player. I think email is a good forum for this. Here is the format I want you to follow.

- Include Dray in all emails.
- Determine when the conversation took place. Any time period in the past in which the players were physically able to have the discussion, common sense dictating of course.
- Any conversations within ear-shot of an NPC will be handled accordingly, although I prefer to not have an NPC within ear-shot of players discussions due to logistical problems (see below).
- Logistically these conversations can be difficult when more than two players are reading and responding to emails at different times. I suggest conversations be minimized to only two players, and to simple subjects. In other words, don't expect to have all the players meet and discuss with Amalia the possibility of her opening a spa on the mid-sea isles.
- Remember that this site can be used for all MSI out of character and some character discussions(I think, I wll check after I am done posting this), and, discussions between more than two players.
- No actions other than discussion. Anything that would require input from the DM, or would effect the DnD world as we know it should be performed during sessions.
- Just keep it simple.

Yeah, but at least when I type I can re-wrtie stfuf.  :oops:

Did U catch that as the original joke stupid-head?

Since we do not have the time to play-out such conversations on our bi-monthly sessions, I encourage this sort of tactic. Please use email to have any conversations "in game" with other players, and "cc" me at my yahoo email address. If you don't have access to it, please email me at work and I will send it to you.

I only have the common sense stipulations that any conversation happen in the past, and that it occured during a time the characters would have been physically able to do so.

I look forward to the forthcoming emails.  :)

Had to re-write the response to this thread twice.

Discussions that do no directly effect gameplay can be had from player to player. I think email is a good forum for this. Here is the format I want you to follow.

- Include Dray in all emails.
- Determine when the conversation took place. Any time period in the past in which the players were physically able to have the discussion, common sense dictating of course.
- Any conversations within ear-shot of an NPC will be handled accordingly, although I prefer to not have an NPC within ear-shot of players discussions due to logistical problems (see below).
- Logistically these conversations can be difficult when more than two players are reading and responding to emails at different times. I suggest conversations be minimized to only two players, and to simple subjects. In other words, don't expect to have all the players meet and discuss with Amalia the possibility of her opening a spa on the mid-sea isles.
- Remember that this site can be used for all MSI out of character and some character discussions(I think, I wll check after I am done posting this), and, discussions between more than two players.
- No actions other than discussion. Anything that would require input from the DM, or would effect the DnD world as we know it should be performed during sessions.
- Just keep it simple.

Yeah, but at least when I type I can re-wrtie stfuf.  :oops:

Did U catch that as the original joke stupid-head?

The rails were as Matt remembered, only visable for a few feet until they went back under the earth.

So, when we play on the 11th of June, the plan is to finish exploring which side? Will you be asking for more personel now? Or after you finish exploring?

If you have time, regurgitate some thoughts so I can be more prepared for Saturday.

Danka

Excellent, this is what I had thought you intended.

Didn't you know that the entire Isle was developed Johan? Now, if I only could get it all on paper....

 :wink:

Thoughts from the DM,

I need to talk to Matt about what Elberrin wants to discuss/learn from Ivellious. Then I can develop for him Elberrin's experiences on August 7th, CY 591.

I would assume the remaining group; Elin, T, Mel, Garvin are going to "call it a day" as it was late afternoon (MSI time) when we adjourned. I would like to see some thoughts in this post on what your genereal consensus is for tomorrow's (August 8th, 591) activity, so I can prepare. Note, up to this point the QuarterMaster has been allowing the group to explore the dungeon for as long as it takes. So you assume he will allow you to continue.

Also note, we will be starting off right where we finished, I just need your thoughts for preparation.

T'riad. Do not despair in your search to become a Master Herbalist. Your quest was not stated upon deaf ears.

Garvin. Despair, you will never be rid of the halfling.  :twisted:

The rails were as Matt remembered, only visable for a few feet until they went back under the earth.

So, when we play on the 11th of June, the plan is to finish exploring which side? Will you be asking for more personel now? Or after you finish exploring?

If you have time, regurgitate some thoughts so I can be more prepared for Saturday.

Danka